Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Realtime Tracker, Inc. v. Relx, Inc., No. 23-1756 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 12, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1756
Decided
November 12, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

REALTIME TRACKER, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

RELX, INC., DBA LEXISNEXIS,

Defendant-Appellee

2023-1756

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:21-cv-08815-PAE, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT K. GOETHALS, Leichtman Law PLLC, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. OLEG KHARITON, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Cincinnati, OH, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN DAVID LUKEN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 12, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Realtime Tracker, Inc. v. Relx, Inc., No. 23-1756 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 12, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1756-20241112
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1756-20241112

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.