Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC, No. 23-1736 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2023)

Dismissed
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1736
Decided
December 15, 2023
Judge
See opinion
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TAASERA LICENSING LLC, QUEST PATENT

RESEARCH CORP.,

Defendants-Appellees

2023-1736

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:22-MD-03042-JRG, 2:22-cv-00314-JRG, Chief Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

O R D E R

The parties, having so agreed, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The above-captioned appeal is dismissed under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) with each side to bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

December 15, 2023 Date ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 15, 2023

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC, No. 23-1736 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1736-20231215
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1736-20231215

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error