Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Xmtt, Inc. v. Intel Corporation, No. 23-1712 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 4, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1712
Decided
December 4, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

XMTT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2023-1712

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:18-cv-01810-MFK, Judge Matthew F. Kennelly.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY ROWLES, Irell & Manella LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MORGAN CHU, BENJAMIN W. HATTENBACH, Los Angeles, CA. PAUL A. BONDOR, Desmarais LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN M. DESMARAIS, JEFFREY SCOTT SEDDON, II; ADAM STEINMETZ, JUSTIN P.D. WILCOX, Washington, DC.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judge, and S , District Judge1).

CHROEDER

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

December 4, 2024

Date

1 Honorable Robert W. Schroeder III, District Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Xmtt, Inc. v. Intel Corporation, No. 23-1712 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 4, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1712-20241204
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1712-20241204

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.