Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bank of America, N.A. v. Nant Holdings IP, LLC, No. 23-1634 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 18, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1634
Decided
October 18, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Appellant

v.

NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC,

Appellee

2023-1634, 2023-1635, 2023-1704, 2023-1705 Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-01081, IPR2021-01304, IPR2021-01332, IPR2021-01333.

JUDGMENT

EIMERIC REIG-PLESSIS, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DUSTIN JAMES EDWARDS, Houston, TX; CLAIRE A. FUNDAKOWSKI, Washington, DC; GEORGE C. LOMBARDI, Chicago, IL. JAMES M. GLASS, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ERIC HUANG; TODD MICHAEL BRIGGS, Redwood Shores, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

October 18, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bank of America, N.A. v. Nant Holdings IP, LLC, No. 23-1634 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 18, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1634-20241018
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1634-20241018

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.