Fed. Cir.

Atos, LLC v. Allstate Insurance Company, No. 23-1619 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 6, 2024)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 23-1619
Decided: December 6, 2024
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ATOS, LLC, DBA RIDEMETRIC,

Appellant

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

2023-1619, 2023-1620

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-01118, IPR2021-01209.

JUDGMENT

ADAM G. UNIKOWSKY, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by BENJAMIN J. BRADFORD, REGINALD J. HILL, Chicago, IL. NATHANIEL C. LOVE, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by STEPHANIE P. KOH.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 6, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Atos, LLC v. Allstate Insurance Company, No. 23-1619 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 6, 2024).

Record ID: CAFC-23-1619-20241206
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1619-20241206

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error