Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Geocomply Solutions Inc. v. Xpoint Services LLC, No. 23-1578 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1578
Decided
November 8, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GEOCOMPLY SOLUTIONS INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

XPOINT SERVICES LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2023-1578

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:22-cv-01273-WCB, Circuit Judge William C. Bryson.

JUDGMENT

SETH W. LLOYD, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DEANNE MAYNARD; RICHARD HUNG, San Francisco, CA; DOUGLAS A. GRADY, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Seattle, WA; ANDREW SAMUELS, Columbus, OH. PETER ANDREW SWANSON, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by GARY RUBMAN; MICHAEL E. BOWLUS, San Francisco, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 8, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Geocomply Solutions Inc. v. Xpoint Services LLC, No. 23-1578 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1578-20241108
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1578-20241108

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.