Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Hebert v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., No. 23-1511 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1511
Decided
April 3, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

LELAND J. HEBERT,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ALLIED RUBBER & GASKET CO.,

Defendant-Appellee

2023-1511

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:20-cv-01350-JOMDD, Judge Jinsook Ohta.

JUDGMENT

MATTHEW MICHAEL WAWRZYN, Wawrzyn LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. JEREMIAH HELM, Knobbe Martens, Irvine, CA, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by STEVEN NATAUPSKY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, LOURIE, Circuit

Judge, and A , District Judge1).

LBRIGHT

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

April 3, 2024

Date

Footnotes

  1. ↩ 1 Honorable Alan Albright, District Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Hebert v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., No. 23-1511 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1511-20240403
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1511-20240403

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error