Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Macroair Technologies, Inc. v. Delta T, LLC, No. 23-1455 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1455
Decided
June 5, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MACROAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

DELTA T, LLC,

Appellee

2023-1455

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-01214.

JUDGMENT

TIMOTHY P. MALONEY, Nixon Peabody LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by THOMAS F. LEBENS, Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP, San Luis Obispo, CA; STEPHEN M. LOBBIN, SML Avvocati PC, La Jolla, CA; JOSEPH F. MARINELLI, Irwin IP LLP, Chicago, IL. JOHN K. BURKE, Vedder Price PC, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOSHUA L. GRANT, MICHAEL J. TURGEON.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

June 5, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Macroair Technologies, Inc. v. Delta T, LLC, No. 23-1455 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1455-20240605
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1455-20240605

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error