Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Wsou Investments LLC v. F5, Inc., No. 23-1427 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 28, 2025)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1427
Decided
February 28, 2025
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC, DBA BRAZOS

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

F5, INC., FKA F5 NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2023-1427

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:21-cv-00126-BJR, Senior Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein.

SUA SPONTE

O R D E R

On February 21, 2025, we entered an Order directing the parties to address whether there is no appealable judgment in this case in light of F5’s assertion of invalidity counterclaims. ECF No. 64. The parties have responded, agreeing that at present there is no appealable judgment and reporting that they have jointly requested that the district court dismiss the invalidity counterclaims without prejudice. ECF No. 66.

22 WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC v. F5, INC.

Having considered the parties’ joint response, we deem the most appropriate course to be to dismiss the appeal so that the district court may act on the parties’ joint request to enter an order that dismisses outstanding counterclaims without prejudice to the counterclaims being reinstated if the judgment dated and entered December 13, 2022 (District Court Docket No. 217) is disturbed on appeal. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, but this court will reinstate the appeal under the same docket number without the payment of an additional filing fee if, no later than 3 p.m. eastern time, March 4, 2025, WSOU Investments LLC has filed a notice of appeal from the entry of an appealable order entered by the district court and so notified this court.

(2) If the appeal is reinstated, the oral argument scheduled for March 5, 2025, will go forward, and the case will be decided by this court based on that oral argument and the briefs already filed.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs. (4) The mandate shall issue forthwith.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

February 28, 2025

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wsou Investments LLC v. F5, Inc., No. 23-1427 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 28, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1427-20250228
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1427-20250228

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.