Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Parkervision, Inc. v. TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd., No. 23-1417 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1417
Decided
June 5, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PARKERVISION, INC.,

Appellant

v.

TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD., LG

ELECTRONICS INC.,

Appellees

2023-1417

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-00985, IPR2022-00246.

JUDGMENT

JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER.

EDWARD JOHN MAYLE, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Denver, CO, argued for appellees. TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. also represented by KRISTOPHER L. REED, Dallas, TX.

2DAVID S. CHUN, Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, for LG Electronics Inc. Also represented by STEVEN PEPE, MATTHEW R. SHAPIRO, New York, NY; SCOTT S. TAYLOR, Boston, MA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

June 5, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Parkervision, Inc. v. TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd., No. 23-1417 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1417-20240605
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1417-20240605

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error