Fed. Cir.

Google LLC v. Ecofactor, Inc., No. 23-1414 (Fed. Cir. July 15, 2024)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 23-1414
Decided: July 15, 2024
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GOOGLE LLC,

Appellant

ECOFACTOR, INC.,

Cross-Appellant

2023-1414, 2023-1429

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-00982.

JUDGMENT

MATTHEW A. SMITH, Smith Baluch LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ELIZABETH LAUGHTON.

JAMES PICKENS, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by KRISTOPHER DAVIS, REZA MIRZAIE.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 15, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Google LLC v. Ecofactor, Inc., No. 23-1414 (Fed. Cir. July 15, 2024).

Record ID: CAFC-23-1414-20240715
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1414-20240715

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error