Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

UNM Rainforest Innovations v. Zyxel Communications Corp., No. 23-1296 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1296
Decided
May 13, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit UNM RAINFOREST INNOVATIONS,

Appellant

v.

ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORP.,

Appellee

2023-1296

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-00377, IPR2021-00739.

JUDGMENT

CECIL E. KEY, DiMuroGinsberg, P.C., Tysons Corner, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAY P. KESAN; MICHAEL W. SHORE, The Shore Firm, Dallas, TX. JONATHAN IAIN MAX DETRIXHE, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by PETER J. CHASSMAN, MICHAEL JOHN FORBES, Houston, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, SCHALL, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

May 13, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

UNM Rainforest Innovations v. Zyxel Communications Corp., No. 23-1296 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1296-20240513
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1296-20240513

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error