Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Inc., No. 23-1246 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1246
Decided
July 13, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AT&T INC.,

Defendant

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP,

SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP, SPRINT SOLUTIONS,

INC., VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL

COMMUNICATIONS, LP,

Defendants-Appellees

2023-1246, 2023-1436

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:17-cv-00718-RWS-RSP, 2:17-cv-00719-RWS-RSP, 2:17-cv-00721-RWS-RSP, Judge Robert Schroeder III.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM PETERSON RAMEY, III, Ramey LLP, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

2BRIAN DAVID SCHMALZBACH, McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, VA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc. also represented by DAVID EVAN FINKELSON; TYLER VANHOUTAN, Houston, TX. JACOB KEVIN BARON, Holland & Knight LLP, Boston, MA, for defendant-appellee Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. Also represented by JOSHUA C. KRUMHOLZ, ALLISON LUCIER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, HUGHES, and CUNNINGHAM, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 13, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Inc., No. 23-1246 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1246-20230713
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1246-20230713

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error