Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Roku, Inc., No. 23-1198 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1198
Decided
June 11, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

ROKU, INC.,

Appellee

2023-1198

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-00758.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL NICODEMA, Greenberg Traurig, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, argued for appellant. Also represented by ERIK BOKAR, Orlando, FL; BENJAMIN GILFORD, JAMES J. LUKAS, JR., Chicago, IL. RICHARD CRUDO, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by LESTIN L. KENTON, JR., WILLIAM MILLIKEN; JONATHAN DANIEL BAKER, Dickinson Wright RLLP,

2Mountain View, CA; MICHAEL DAVID SAUNDERS, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Austin, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

June 11, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Roku, Inc., No. 23-1198 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1198-20240611
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1198-20240611

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.