Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Patent Quality Assurance LLC, No. 23-118 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2023)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-118
Decided
March 6, 2023
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit In re: PATENT QUALITY ASSURANCE LLC,

Petitioner 2023-118

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Patent and Trademark Office in No. IPR2021-01229.

ON PETITION AND MOTION

Before DYK, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

Patent Quality Assurance LLC (PQA) moves to voluntarily dismiss its petition for a writ of mandamus “with the following terms: PQA bears costs and each Party bears its own fees.” ECF No. 26 at 3. PQA states that the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office “does not oppose the motion to dismiss the petition and to bear its own costs and fees” and that VLSI Technology LLC “does not oppose PQA’s dismissal but respectfully submits that PQA should be ordered to pay VLSI’s fees and costs.” Id. Upon consideration thereof,

22 IN RE: PATENT QUALITY ASSURANCE LLC

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The petition is dismissed. PQA shall bear costs. Each side shall bear its own fees.

FOR THE COURT

March 6, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Patent Quality Assurance LLC, No. 23-118 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-23-118-20230306
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-118-20230306

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.