Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Universal Electronics, Inc., No. 23-1138 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1138
Decided
March 6, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Appellant 2023-1138

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/785,954.

JUDGMENT

BENJAMIN GILFORD, Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES J. LUKAS, JR., GARY R. JAROSIK; ERIK BOKAR, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Orlando, FL. FAHD H. PATEL, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by MICHAEL S. FORMAN, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, KEVIN RICHARDS.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and CUNNINGHAM, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

March 6, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Universal Electronics, Inc., No. 23-1138 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-23-1138-20240306
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-23-1138-20240306

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error