NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
VOICE TECH CORP.,
Appellant
v.
MYCROFT AI INC.,
Appellee
2023-1033
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01739.
JUDGMENT
ERIC MICHAEL ADAMS, Tumey LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. SANJIV P. LAUD, McCurdy LLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDRA H. MOSS, Public Interest Patent Law Institute, South Pasadena, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Voice Tech Corp. v. Mycroft AI Inc., No. 23-1033 (Fed. Cir. May 6, 2024).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.
