Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

O'Brien v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 22-2140 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-2140
Decided
November 13, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ROYAL J. O'BRIEN,

Appellant

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Appellee

2022-2140

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-00015.

JUDGMENT

MARK L. LORBIECKI, Williams Kastner PLLC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 13, 2023

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

O'Brien v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 22-2140 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-2140-20231113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-2140-20231113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.