Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 22-2134 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-2134
Decided
June 11, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., APPLE INC.,

Appellees

2022-2134

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-00145.

JUDGMENT

PHILIP GRAVES, Graves & Shaw LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by GREER N. SHAW; ROBERT M. ASHER, Sunstein LLP, Boston, MA; BRYCE BARCELO, ROCCO MAGNI, BRIAN MELTON, Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX; KALPANA SRINIVASAN, Los Angeles, CA. STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper US LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for appellees. Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America,

2Inc. also represented by TIFFANY CAROL MILLER; JAMES MARTIN HEINTZ, Reston, VA. LAUREN ANN DEGNAN, Fish & Richardson P.C., Washington, DC, for appellee Apple Inc. Also represented by WALTER KARL RENNER; NITIKA GUPTA FIORELLA, Wilmington, DE; ALEXANDER MICHAEL PECHETTE, Boston, MA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and STARK, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

June 11, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 22-2134 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-2134-20240611
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-2134-20240611

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error