Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., No. 22-2124 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-2124
Decided
October 11, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY

LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA,

INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC., CADILA

HEALTHCARE LTD.,

Defendants-Appellants

2022-2124

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 3:18-cv-11792-FLW-TJB, Judge Freda L. Wolfson.

JUDGMENT

ERIC J. LOBENFELD, Cherry Hill, NJ, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by BENJAMIN HOLT, RYAN STEPHENSON, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC. STEVEN J. MOORE, Withers Bergman LLP, Greenwich,

2CT, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by JAMES EDWARD NEALON, Nealon Law LLC, Stamford, CT. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, STOLL and

CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

October 11, 2023

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., No. 22-2124 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-2124-20231011
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-2124-20231011

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error