Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Olati LLC v. Haas Automation, Inc., No. 22-2027 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-2027
Decided
November 14, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

OLATI LLC,

Appellant

v.

HAAS AUTOMATION, INC.,

Appellee

2022-2027

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-00146.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT R. BRUNELLI, Sheridan Ross PC, Denver, CO, argued for appellant. MICHAEL JOHN LYONS, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by DION MICHAEL BREGMAN, JASON EVAN GETTLEMAN, AUSTIN ZUCK; JULIE S. GOLDEMBERG, Philadelphia, PA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 14, 2023

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Olati LLC v. Haas Automation, Inc., No. 22-2027 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-2027-20231114
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-2027-20231114

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.