Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sito Mobile R&D IP, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, No. 22-1990 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1990
Decided
April 5, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD.,

Appellants

v.

HULU, LLC,

Appellee

2022-1990, 2022-1991

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-00298, IPR2021-00304.

JUDGMENT

STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG, KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA. BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN;

2NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San Francisco, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

April 5, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sito Mobile R&D IP, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, No. 22-1990 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1990-20240405
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1990-20240405

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error