Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Analog Devices, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc., No. 22-1987 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2022)

Granted
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1987
Decided
December 13, 2022
Judge
Stark, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ANALOG DEVICES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

XILINX, INC., XILINX ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD.,

Appellees

2022-1987

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01624. In re: XILINX, INC., XILINX ASIA PACIFIC PTE.

LTD.,

Appellants 2022-2021

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01624.

2ON MOTION

Before STARK, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

Analog Devices, Inc. moves unopposed to voluntarily dismiss Appeal No. 2022-1987 pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), and to withdraw as a party from Appeal No. 2022-2021. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. (2) Appeal No 2022-1987 is dismissed. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs in Appeal No. 2022-1987. (4) The revised official caption and short caption for the remaining appeal, Appeal No. 2022-2021, are reflected in this order. (5) Within 30 days of the date of filing of this order, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) is directed to inform this court whether it intends to intervene in Appeal No. 2022-2021. (6) If the PTO elects to participate as intervenor, its docketing statement is due within 14 days of the date of filing of its notice of intervention and its brief shall be served within 40 days of the date of filing of appellants’ opening brief.

FOR THE COURT

December 13, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

3cc: United States Patent and Trademark Office ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2022-1987 only): December 13, 2022

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Analog Devices, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc., No. 22-1987 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1987-20221213
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1987-20221213

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.