Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sentius International, LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 22-1980 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1980
Decided
December 11, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SENTIUS INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Appellee

2022-1980

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01646.

JUDGMENT

SANDEEP SETH, SethLaw, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT YORIO, Carr & Ferrell LLP, San Mateo, CA. ALYSSA BARNARD-YANNI, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, MARK S. DAVIES, Washington, DC.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

December 11, 2023

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sentius International, LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 22-1980 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1980-20231211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1980-20231211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.