Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sito Mobile R&D IP, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, No. 22-1926 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1926
Decided
April 5, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD.,

Appellants

v.

HULU, LLC,

Appellee

2022-1926, 2022-1927, 2022-1977, 2022-1989, 2022-2262

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-00158, IPR2021-00206, IPR2021-00219, IPR2021-00265, IPR2021-00308.

JUDGMENT

STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG, KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA. AMY LIANG, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN, BRETT JOHNSTON

2WILLIAMSON, Newport Beach, CA NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

April 5, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sito Mobile R&D IP, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, No. 22-1926 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1926-20240405
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1926-20240405

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error