Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Omnitracs, LLC v. Platform Science, Inc., No. 22-1916 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1916
Decided
April 3, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

OMNITRACS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

PLATFORM SCIENCE, INC.,

Appellee

2022-1916, 2022-1917

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-01517, IPR2020-01518.

JUDGMENT

JASON M. WILCOX, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DIVA R. HOLLIS, JOHN C. O'QUINN; ADAM R. ALPER, San Francisco, CA; GIANNI CUTRI, Chicago, IL; MICHAEL W. DE VRIES, Los Angeles, CA. JOHN C. PHILLIPS, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by OLIVER RICHARDS, JASON W. WOLFF.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

April 3, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Omnitracs, LLC v. Platform Science, Inc., No. 22-1916 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1916-20240403
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1916-20240403

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.