Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sonova AG v. Med-El Elektromedizinische Gerate GmbH, No. 22-1865 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1865
Decided
June 9, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SONOVA AG,

Appellant

v.

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERATE

GMBH,

Appellee

2022-1865

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-00023.

JUDGMENT

MARCUS EDWARD SERNEL, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by GREG MATTHEW POLINS.

KATHRYN E. NOLL, Sunstein LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by LISA M. TITTEMORE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 9, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow

Acting Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sonova AG v. Med-El Elektromedizinische Gerate GmbH, No. 22-1865 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1865-20230609
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1865-20230609

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.