Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Team Worldwide Corporation v. Intex Recreation Corp., No. 22-1860 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1860
Decided
October 11, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit TEAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

INTEX RECREATION CORP., BESTWAY (USA),

INC.,

Appellees

2022-1860

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00859.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT M. HARKINS, JR., Cherian LLP, Berkeley, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES MICHAEL WOODS, Washington, DC; TIMOTHY E. BIANCHI, Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, PA, Minneapolis, MN. ANDREW M. MCCOY, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for all appellees. Appellee Intex Recreation Corp. also represented by R. TREVOR CARTER, REID E. DODGE.

2JOHN S. ARTZ, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI, for appellee Bestway (USA), Inc. Also represented by STEVEN A. CALOIARO, Reno, NV. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

October 11, 2023

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Team Worldwide Corporation v. Intex Recreation Corp., No. 22-1860 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1860-20231011
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1860-20231011

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error