Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Probatter Sports, LLC v. Sports Tutor, Inc., No. 22-1814 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1814
Decided
November 14, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PROBATTER SPORTS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SPORTS TUTOR, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2022-1814

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in No. 3:05-cv-01975-VLB, Judge Vanessa Lynne Bryant.

JUDGMENT

JOHN RICHARD HORVACK, JR., Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, New Haven, CT, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DAMIAN KEVIN GUNNINGSMITH, FATIMA LAHNIN.

CHRISTOPHER B. ROBERTS, Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wanger, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by JOHN C. MCNETT.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 14, 2023

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Probatter Sports, LLC v. Sports Tutor, Inc., No. 22-1814 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1814-20231114
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1814-20231114

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error