Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Kuster v. Western Digital Corporation, No. 22-1644 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 11, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1644
Decided
January 11, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MARTIN KUSTER,

Appellant

v.

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SANDISK LLC,

Cross-Appellants

2022-1644, 2022-1645, 2022-1713

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-01391, IPR2020-01410.

JUDGMENT

DAVID A. REED, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RUSSELL KORN, ANDREW N. SAUL; FREDERICK LEE WHITMER, New York, NY. L. KIERAN KIECKHEFER, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for cross-appellants. Also represented by BRIAN BUROKER, Washington, DC; BLAINE H. EVANSON, Irvine, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

January 11, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kuster v. Western Digital Corporation, No. 22-1644 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 11, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1644-20240111
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1644-20240111

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.