Fed. Cir.

Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Beckman Coulter, Inc., No. 22-1579 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 3, 2023)

General / Procedural

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 22-1579
Decided: January 3, 2023
Judge: See opinion
Document: Nonprecedential Opinion
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

BECKMAN COULTER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2022-1579

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:21-cv-00833-CFC-JLH, Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly.

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b).

22 BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY V. BECKMAN COULTER,

INC. (2) Each side shall bear their own costs. FOR THE COURT

January 3, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 3, 2023

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Beckman Coulter, Inc., No. 22-1579 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 3, 2023).

Record ID: CAFC-22-1579-20230103
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1579-20230103

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error