Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Deng, No. 22-1568 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1568
Decided
March 7, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: HAIXIA DENG, YONGBONG HAN, CHARAN

MASARAPU, YOGESH KUMAR ANGUCHAMY,

HERMAN A. LOPEZ, SUJEET KUMAR,

Appellants

2022-1568

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/425,696.

JUDGMENT

PETER S. DARDI, Christensen Fonder Dardi & Herbert, PLLC, Maple Grove, MN, argued for appellants Haixia Deng, Yongbong Han, Charan Masarapu, Yogesh Kumar Anguchamy, Herman A. Lopez, Sujeet Kumar. Also represented by DONALD W. NILES, Niles Law Office, P.A., Wadena, MN. DANIEL KAZHDAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, BRIAN RACILLA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (CHEN, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 7, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Deng, No. 22-1568 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1568-20230307
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1568-20230307

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error