Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Analog Devices, Inc. v. Vidal, No. 22-1536 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1536
Decided
March 6, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ANALOG DEVICES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor 2022-1536

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01210.

JUDGMENT

JASJIT S. VIDWAN, ArentFox Schiff LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by TANIEL E. ANDERSON, RICHARD J. BERMAN, JANINE A. CARLAN.

WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by OMAR FAROOQ

2AMIN, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, PETER JOHN SAWERT.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

March 6, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Analog Devices, Inc. v. Vidal, No. 22-1536 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1536-20240306
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1536-20240306

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.