Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Wang, No. 22-1510 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 4, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1510
Decided
September 4, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: KEVIN SUNLIN WANG,

Appellant

2022-1510, 2022-1518

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 14/967,301, 15/717,594.

JUDGMENT

KEVIN S. WANG, Law Office of Wood Wang & Associates, PLLC, Flushing, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID JOHN WOOD, I; DAVID AKER, Ohlandt, Greeley, Ruggiero & Perle, LLP, Stamford, CT. MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by ROBERT MCBRIDE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

September 4, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Wang, No. 22-1510 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 4, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1510-20240904
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1510-20240904

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.