Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Acorn Semi, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 22-1499 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 6, 2023)

Granted
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1499
Decided
January 6, 2023
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ACORN SEMI, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN

SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC,

Defendants-Appellants

2022-1499

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:19-cv-00347-JRG, Chief Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

ON MOTION

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to voluntarily dismiss the above-captioned appeal pursuant to2 2 ACORN SEMI, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. Federal Circuit Rule 42(b) with prejudice and with the parties to bear their own costs and fees, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

January 6, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 6, 2023

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Acorn Semi, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 22-1499 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 6, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1499-20230106
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1499-20230106

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.