Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., No. 22-1495 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1495
Decided
May 4, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A.,

Appellant

v.

SIERRA WIRELESS, INC., TELIT CINTERION

DEUTSCHLAND GMBH,

Appellees

2022-1495

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01103.

JUDGMENT

ANDREW PETER DEMARCO, Devlin Law Firm, Wilmington, DE, for appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY DEVLIN, ROBERT J. GAJARSA.

KOURTNEY MUELLER MERRILL, Perkins Coie LLP, Denver, CO, argued for all appellees. Appellee Sierra Wireless, Inc. also represented by AMANDA TESSAR. GUY YONAY, Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz LLP,

2New York, NY, for appellee Telit Cinterion Deutschland GmbH. Also represented by KYLE AUTERI, I. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 4, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., No. 22-1495 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1495-20230504
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1495-20230504

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.