Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Vederi, LLC v. Google LLC, No. 22-1477 (Fed. Cir. July 12, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1477
Decided
July 12, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VEDERI, LLC,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Appellee

2022-1477, 2022-1478, 2022-1479, 2022-1480 Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/000,681, 95/000,682, 95/000,683, 95/000,684.

JUDGMENT

SHAUN PHILIP LEE, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, Glendale, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID A. DILLARD. DAVID ALMELING, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by MARK LIANG, DANIEL SILVERMAN, DARIN W. SNYDER, SORIN GABRIEL ZAHARIA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 12, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow

Acting Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Vederi, LLC v. Google LLC, No. 22-1477 (Fed. Cir. July 12, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1477-20230712
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1477-20230712

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.