Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Arbor Global Strategies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 22-1465 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1465
Decided
July 16, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ARBOR GLOBAL STRATEGIES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., TAIWAN

SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY,

LTD.,

Appellees

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2022-1465, 2022-1466, 2022-1467

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-01020, IPR2020-01021, IPR2020-01022.

ARBOR GLOBAL STRATEGIES, LLC,

Appellant

2v.

XILINX, INC., TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR

MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.,

Appellees

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2022-1549, 2022-1550, 2022-1551, 2022-1552

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-01567, IPR2020-01568, IPR2020-01570, IPR2020-01571.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL NOAH LERMAN, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE, JAMES R. HANNAH, LISA KOBIALKA, Redwood Shores, CA, JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY. JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. also represented by WILLIAM H. BURGESS, CHRISTOPHER MIZZO; MEREDITH ZINANNI, Chicago, IL. JAMES M. GLASS, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,

3LLP, New York, NY, for appellee Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Also represented by ERIC HUANG.

JEFFREY SHNEIDMAN, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA, argued for appellee Xilinx, Inc. Also represented by KENNETH WAYNE DARBY, DAVID M. HOFFMAN, Austin, TX; JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Minneapolis, MN. DANA KAERSVANG, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, JOSHUA MARC SALZMAN; MICHAEL S. FORMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MICHAEL TYLER, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 3 of the opinion

July 16, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Arbor Global Strategies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 22-1465 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1465-20240716
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1465-20240716

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.