Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

DSS, Inc. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., No. 22-1372 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2024)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1372
Decided
April 5, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

DSS, INC., FKA DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS,

INC.,

Appellant

v.

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., SEOUL

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

Appellees

2022-1372

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-00938.

JUDGMENT

MATTHEW J. SMITH, Remenick PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES REMENICK; PAUL ANTHONY KROEGER, BRIAN DAVID LEDAHL, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA. ETAI LAHAV, Radulescu LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellees. Also represented by JONATHAN AUERBACH, DAVID C. RADULESCU, BRYON T. WASSERMAN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges,

and A , District Judge1).

LBRIGHT

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

April 5, 2024

Date

Footnotes

  1. ↩ 1 Honorable Alan D Albright, District Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

DSS, Inc. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., No. 22-1372 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1372-20240405
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1372-20240405

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error