Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Macdermid Enthone Inc. v. Basf Corporation, No. 22-1356 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1356
Decided
July 13, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MACDERMID ENTHONE INC., FKA ENTHONE,

INC.,

Appellant

v.

BASF CORPORATION,

Appellee

2022-1356

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-00696.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT M. EVANS, JR., Lewis Rice LLC, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL HENRY DURBIN, MICHAEL J. HARTLEY.

RUSSELL BLYTHE, King & Spalding LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by HOLMES J. HAWKINS, III; JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ, JOSHUA NATHANIEL MITCHELL, Washington, DC.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 13, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Macdermid Enthone Inc. v. Basf Corporation, No. 22-1356 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1356-20230713
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1356-20230713

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.