Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Glux Visual Effects Tech (Shenzhen) Co., No. 22-1344 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1344
Decided
January 13, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ULTRAVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

GLUX VISUAL EFFECTS TECH (SHENZHEN) CO., LEYARD OPTOELECTRONIC CO., SHENZHEN

LIANTRONICS CO., LTD., UNILUMIN GROUP CO.,

LTD.,

Appellees

2022-1344

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01052.

JUDGMENT

PETER LAMBRIANAKOS, Fabricant LLP, Rye, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALFRED ROSS FABRICANT, JOSEPH M. MERCADANTE, VINCENT J. RUBINO, III.

JORDAN BOCK, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also represented by KEVIN PAUL

2MARTIN; NAOMI BIRBACH, LINNEA P. CIPRIANO, New York, NY; MONTE COOPER, Redwood City, CA; PATRICK MCCARTHY, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 13, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Glux Visual Effects Tech (Shenzhen) Co., No. 22-1344 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1344-20230113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1344-20230113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error