Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Apple Inc. v. Corephotonics, Ltd., No. 22-1325 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1325
Decided
November 9, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

APPLE INC.,

Appellant

v.

COREPHOTONICS, LTD.,

Cross-Appellant

2022-1325, 2022-1327

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-00878, IPR2020-00896, IPR2020-00897.

JUDGMENT

ANGELA M. OLIVER, Haynes and Boone, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS, ANDREW S. EHMKE, Dallas, TX. BRIAN DAVID LEDAHL, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by MARC A. FENSTER, NEIL RUBIN, JAMES S. TSUEI.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MAYER, and STARK, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

November 9, 2023

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Apple Inc. v. Corephotonics, Ltd., No. 22-1325 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1325-20231109
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1325-20231109

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error