Fed. Cir.

Apple Inc. v. Corephotonics, Ltd., No. 22-1324 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 22-1324
Decided: July 14, 2023
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

APPLE INC.,

Appellant

COREPHOTONICS, LTD.,

Appellee

2022-1324

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-00877.

JUDGMENT

JAMES ANGLIN FLYNN, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by MARK S. DAVIES, Washington, DC. MARC A. FENSTER, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by NEIL RUBIN, JAMES S. TSUEI.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (STOLL, LINN, and STARK, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 14, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Apple Inc. v. Corephotonics, Ltd., No. 22-1324 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023).

Record ID: CAFC-22-1324-20230714
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1324-20230714

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error