Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

ONE World Technologies, Inc. v. Chervon (HK) Limited, No. 22-1320 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1320
Decided
April 10, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DBA

TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES POWER EQUIPMENT,

Appellant

v.

CHERVON (HK) LIMITED,

Appellee

2022-1320, 2022-1321, 2022-1322, 2022-1323 Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-00884, IPR2020-00886, IPR2020-00887, IPR2020-00888.

JUDGMENT

STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper US LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM, EDWARD SIKORSKI.

MICHAEL ANTHONY NICODEMA, Greenberg Traurig LLP, West Palm Beach, FL, argued for appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN GILFORD, JAMES J. LUKAS, JR., Chicago, IL.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 10, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

ONE World Technologies, Inc. v. Chervon (HK) Limited, No. 22-1320 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1320-20230410
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1320-20230410

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.