Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Cellect, LLC, No. 22-1292 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1292
Decided
June 14, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: CELLECT, LLC,

Appellant

2022-1292

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/014,452.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN CAPLAN, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant Cellect, LLC. Also represented by JEFFREY PRICE; PAUL J. ANDRE, JAMES R. HANNAH, Redwood Shores, CA.

KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, BRIAN RACILLA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, for amici curiae Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Also represented by SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN; JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS,

2JR., East Palo Alto, CA; ALEXANDER E. MIDDLETON, New York, NY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 14, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow

Acting Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Cellect, LLC, No. 22-1292 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1292-20230614
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1292-20230614

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.