Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino'S Pizza, LLC, No. 22-1200 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1200
Decided
September 12, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

AMERANTH, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DOMINO'S PIZZA, LLC, DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees 2022-1200, 2022-2223

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:12-cv-00733-DMS-WVG, Judge Dana M. Sabraw.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT F. RUYAK, Larson LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JERROLD GANZFRIED, Ganzfried Law, Washington, DC; JOHN WILLIAM OSBORNE, Osborne Law LLC, Cortlandt Manor, NY.

FRANK A. ANGILERI, Brooks Kushman P.C., Southfield, MI, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by THOMAS W. CUNNINGHAM.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, PROST, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 12, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino'S Pizza, LLC, No. 22-1200 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1200-20230912
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1200-20230912

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error