Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

IPA Technologies Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc., No. 22-1193 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1193
Decided
January 18, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IPA TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON DIGITAL

SERVICES, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

2022-1193

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:16-cv-01266-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

MATTHEW D. POWERS, Tensegrity Law Group LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by PAUL EHRLICH, ROBERT LEWIS GERRITY; AZRA HADZIMEHMEDOVIC, KILEY WHITE, McLean, VA. J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by RAVI RAGAVENDRA RANGANATH, VIGEN

2SALMASTLIAN, SAINA S. SHAMILOV; TODD RICHARD GREGORIAN, San Francisco, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, DYK and PROST,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 18, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

IPA Technologies Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc., No. 22-1193 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1193-20230118
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1193-20230118

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error