Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Panduit Corp. v. Corning Incorporated, No. 22-1167 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2022)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1167
Decided
October 6, 2022
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PANDUIT CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CORNING INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee

2022-1167

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina in No. 5:18-cv-00229-FL, Judge Louise Wood Flanagan.

ON MOTION

Before PROST, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Panduit Corp.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the above-captioned appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), IT IS ORDERED THAT:

22 PANDUIT CORP. v. CORNING INCORPORATED The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed with each side to bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

October 6, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 6, 2022

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Panduit Corp. v. Corning Incorporated, No. 22-1167 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1167-20221006
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1167-20221006

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.