Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Adeia Semiconductor Technologies LLC v. Nvidia Corporation, No. 22-1112 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 22, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1112
Decided
March 22, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Appellant

v.

NVIDIA CORPORATION, SEMICONDUCTOR

COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC, DBA ON

SEMICONDUCTOR,

Appellees

2022-1112, 2022-1113

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-00602, IPR2020-00603.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD L. RAINEY, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by TAREK AUSTIN; NITIN SUBHEDAR, San Francisco, CA. STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper US LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for appellee NVIDIA Corporation. Also represented by CLAYTON W. THOMPSON, II, YAKOV ZOLOTOREV, East Palo Alto, CA.

2MICHAEL HAWES, Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX, for appellee Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC. Also represented by ROGER FULGHUM; BRETT J. THOMPSEN, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Austin, TX.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 22, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Adeia Semiconductor Technologies LLC v. Nvidia Corporation, No. 22-1112 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 22, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1112-20230322
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1112-20230322

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.