Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cellect, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 22-1100 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1100
Decided
June 14, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CELLECT, LLC,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Appellees

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2022-1100, 2022-1101, 2022-1272, 2022-1273

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-00475, IPR2020-00476, IPR2020-00477, IPR2020-00512.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN CAPLAN, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by JEFFREY PRICE; PAUL J. ANDRE, JAMES R.

2HANNAH, Redwood Shores, CA. DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN; JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., East Palo Alto, CA. MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 14, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow

Acting Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cellect, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 22-1100 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1100-20230614
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1100-20230614

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error